Health

Sarcopenia: what it is, treatment and what peptides show

What sarcopenia is, how it is diagnosed, what guidelines recommend and what GH secretagogues, anamorelin and GLP-1 drugs have shown about muscle.

Published November 9, 2026 · 10 min read · 28 sources

What is sarcopenia and how many people does it affect?

Sarcopenia is a muscle disease (muscle failure) rooted in adverse muscle changes that accrue across a lifetime; it is common in older age but can also occur earlier. The revised European consensus (EWGSOP2) defines it by low muscle strength as the key characteristic, confirms the diagnosis by detecting low muscle quantity or quality, and treats poor physical performance as indicating severe sarcopenia1. It has had its own ICD-10-CM code (M62.84) since 20165.

How common it is depends on the definition. A systematic review of 263 eligible studies (151 in the meta-analysis, 692,056 participants, mean age 68.5 years) found that the prevalence of sarcopenia varied between 10% and 27% depending on the classification, cut-off points and measuring instrument, and that of severe sarcopenia between 2% and 9%2. The international ICFSR guideline cites roughly 6% to 22% of older adults3. A Lancet review summarizes the clinical picture and biology of the disorder6.

It is not a minor diagnosis. In a review of 17 prospective studies using the European definition, sarcopenia was associated with higher mortality (pooled odds ratio 3.60; 95% CI 2.96 to 4.37) and functional decline (odds ratio 3.03; 95% CI 1.80 to 5.12), and with more falls and hospitalizations, although data on fractures were less clear4.

10-27%prevalence range of sarcopenia depending on definition (151 studies, 692,056 participants)2
2-9%prevalence range of severe sarcopenia in the same review2
OR 3.60mortality in people with versus without sarcopenia in a meta-analysis of prospective studies4
<27 kg / <16 kglow handgrip strength in men / women per EWGSOP21

Symptoms and diagnosis: how sarcopenia is recognized

Symptoms are functional: slow walking, difficulty rising from a chair, weak grip and falls. The ICFSR guideline recommends rapid screening with gait speed or the SARC-F questionnaire, followed by diagnosis with an internationally accepted tool such as the EWGSOP or FNIH definitions3.

The European algorithm starts from strength: handgrip below 27 kg in men and 16 kg in women is considered low. If strength is low, the diagnosis is confirmed by measuring muscle quantity or quality (for example, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry), and if physical performance is also poor (gait speed of 0.8 m/s or less) it is rated severe1. The FNIH group proposed cut-points based on handgrip strength and appendicular lean mass7, the Asian group (AWGS 2019) published its own update8, and a US consortium (SDOC) published position statements on the definition and outcomes9. Having several definitions is why prevalence figures do not match.

Standard treatment today

The international ICFSR guideline strongly recommends resistance-based physical activity and conditionally recommends protein supplementation or a protein-rich diet. It made no recommendation on vitamin D supplementation or on prescribing anabolic hormones, and noted a lack of robust evidence for other options3.

A meta-analysis of resistance training in older adults supports its effect on muscular strength10, and another meta-analysis found that protein supplementation augmented the adaptive response of skeletal muscle to resistance training11. The PROT-AGE group published evidence-based recommendations on dietary protein intake in older people12.

Weight loss in older adults shows why exercise matters. In a one-year randomized trial of 107 obese adults aged 65 or older, body weight fell 10% with diet and 9% with diet plus exercise, but lean mass fell 5% in the diet-only group versus 3% in the diet-plus-exercise group, and physical function improved more with the combination (21% versus 12% with diet and 15% with exercise alone)13.

It is worth being clear from the start: no peptide is approved to treat sarcopenia, and most studies measured body composition, not function. What follows describes what was observed in each family. More context in Growth hormone secretagogue guide and The secretagogue and IGF-1 debate.

Growth hormone (GH). It is not a secretagogue but the hormone itself, yet it is the benchmark for that family. In a double-blind trial of 52 healthy men older than 69 with low IGF-1, six months of GH increased lean mass 4.3% (versus a 0.1% decrease with placebo) and reduced fat mass 13.1%, but there were no differences in knee or handgrip strength or endurance, and adverse events were more frequent (48 incidents versus 14); 26% of those treated needed a dose reduction14. A systematic review of 31 articles (18 populations; 220 treated participants completing the studies) found a lean-mass gain of 2.1 kg and a fat-mass reduction of 2.1 kg, with more edema, arthralgias, carpal tunnel syndrome and gynecomastia, and somewhat more diabetes and impaired fasting glucose; its authors concluded that GH cannot be recommended as an antiaging therapy15. Combined with testosterone for 16 weeks in 122 men aged about 70, GH appeared to enhance the gains in lean mass and strength produced by testosterone, with rises in blood pressure16.

MK-677 (ibutamoren), not a peptide. It is an oral ghrelin mimetic that activates the same receptor as peptide secretagogues. In a two-year randomized trial of 65 healthy adults aged 60 to 81, 25 mg daily raised GH and IGF-1 to young-adult levels. At one year, fat-free mass increased 1.1 kg with MK-677 versus a 0.5 kg decrease with placebo (P < 0.001), but strength and function did not change; fasting glucose rose 5 mg/dL and insulin sensitivity decreased. The authors noted the study was underpowered for functional end points17.

Tesamorelin. It is a GH-releasing hormone analog. In a trial of 412 patients with HIV and abdominal fat accumulation, 26 weeks of tesamorelin reduced visceral adipose tissue by 15.2% (versus a 5.0% increase with placebo) and raised IGF-1 by 81%18. The FDA label indicates EGRIFTA SV for the reduction of excess abdominal fat in HIV-infected adults with lipodystrophy, states that it is not indicated for weight management, and that long-term cardiovascular safety has not been established19. The sources consulted did not show a tesamorelin trial in sarcopenia. See Tesamorelin: the approved GHRH analog.

Ghrelin, sermorelin, ipamorelin and other secretagogues. Ghrelin was described in 1999 as an acylated peptide from the stomach that releases growth hormone20. For ipamorelin, the only human trial that turned up in the search was a proof-of-concept study in postoperative ileus, not muscle27. The sources consulted did not show randomized trials of sermorelin or ipamorelin in sarcopenia, so their effect on muscle in older people is today a hypothesis, not a finding.

Anamorelin (cachexia). It is an oral ghrelin-receptor agonist, not the natural peptide, and its evidence is in cancer cachexia, a neighboring condition in which sarcopenia is one of the defining criteria28. In ROMANA 1 and 2 (979 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer), lean mass increased 0.99 and 0.65 kg with anamorelin and fell 0.47 and 0.98 kg with placebo, with no difference in handgrip strength21. The 2020 ASCO guideline recommends no specific drug as standard22. Japan approved it in January 2021 for cancer-associated cachexia23, and the EMA refused authorization in 2017 for a marginal effect on lean mass and no proven effect on strength or quality of life24. Detail in Cancer cachexia and anamorelin.

GLP-1 drugs: the reverse question. GLP-1 agonists are not studied to gain muscle but for the opposite question: how much is lost when weight falls. A 2024 review notes that the share of weight loss that is lean mass ranges from 40-60% in some studies to about 15% or less in others, that lean mass includes organs, water and bone as well as muscle, and that MRI studies suggest skeletal muscle changes are adaptive and commensurate with what is expected for age, disease and weight lost. Still, it warns that older age and disease severity may influence candidate selection because of sarcopenia risk, and that drugs to pair with GLP-1 therapies to preserve muscle are under development25. See GLP-1s: muscle, rebound, eyes and pancreas.

Bimagrumab (antibody, not a peptide). It blocks activin type II receptors. In a trial of 180 people aged 70 or older with sarcopenia, 6 months of bimagrumab increased lean mass 7% versus 1% with placebo (P < 0.001), but the improvement in the Short Physical Performance Battery (1.34 versus 1.03 points; P = 0.13) and in gait speed was not significantly different from placebo; both groups received adequate diet and home exercise, and several authors were employees of the manufacturer26.

Safety: adverse effects and precautions

Safety signals depend on the agent. GH in older people produced edema, arthralgias, carpal tunnel syndrome, gynecomastia and more diabetes or impaired glucose15; with MK-677, fasting glucose, cortisol, appetite, mild edema and muscle pain increased and insulin sensitivity decreased17. The tesamorelin label warns that long-term cardiovascular safety has not been established19. In ROMANA 1 and 2 the most frequent grade 3-4 event with anamorelin was hyperglycemia, in under 1% and 1% of patients21. With GLP-1 drugs, the risk is lean-mass loss during rapid weight loss, which resistance exercise attenuates in older adults1325.

Summary by agent

Growth hormone — no sarcopenia indicationBest evidence: lean mass +4.3% versus −0.1% in 52 older men, no strength gain. Caution: edema, arthralgias, glucose1415
MK-677 — oral ghrelin mimetic, not a peptideFat-free mass +1.1 kg versus −0.5 kg at one year in 65 older adults; no change in strength or function. Caution: glucose, insulin sensitivity17
Tesamorelin — approved for abdominal fat in HIV lipodystrophyVisceral fat −15.2% versus +5.0% in 412 patients. No sarcopenia trial in the sources consulted1819
Sermorelin, ipamorelin — no sarcopenia trialsNo randomized trials in sarcopenia found in the sources consulted27
Anamorelin — approved in Japan for cancer cachexiaLean mass +0.99 and +0.65 kg versus losses with placebo; no strength effect. Refused by the EMA212324
GLP-1 drugs — approved for obesity and diabetes, not for musclePart of weight loss is lean mass (15% to 40-60% depending on the study); resistance exercise attenuates it1325
Bimagrumab — antibody, not a peptideLean mass +7% versus +1%, but no significant improvement in physical performance in 180 people26

Frequently asked questions

What is sarcopenia? It is a muscle disease defined by low muscle strength, confirmed by low muscle quantity or quality; if physical performance is also poor, it is considered severe1.

Is any peptide approved for sarcopenia? Not in the sources consulted. Tesamorelin is indicated only for excess abdominal fat in HIV lipodystrophy19, and anamorelin is approved in Japan for cancer cachexia, not sarcopenia23.

What do guidelines recommend for treating it? The ICFSR guideline strongly recommends resistance-based physical activity and conditionally recommends a protein-rich diet or protein supplements; it makes no recommendation on anabolic hormones3.

Does growth hormone improve strength in older adults? In the trial of 52 men it increased lean mass 4.3% but did not improve strength or endurance, and the 2007 review concluded it cannot be recommended as an antiaging therapy1415.

Do GLP-1 drugs make you lose muscle? Some lean mass is lost with weight loss; in some studies it is 40-60% of weight lost and in others about 15% or less, and MRI studies suggest muscle changes are commensurate with what is expected25. In older adults with obesity, adding exercise to dieting reduced lean-mass loss from 5% to 3%13.

How many people have sarcopenia? It depends on the definition: between 10% and 27% in a review of 151 studies, and between 2% and 9% for the severe form2.

Sources

  1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48:16-31. PubMed 30312372 ↗
  2. Petermann-Rocha F, et al. Global prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022;13:86-99. PubMed 34816624 ↗
  3. Dent E, et al. International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Sarcopenia (ICFSR): Screening, Diagnosis and Management. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22:1148-1161. PubMed 30498820 ↗
  4. Beaudart C, et al. Health Outcomes of Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0169548. PubMed 28095426 ↗
  5. Anker SD, Morley JE, et al. Welcome to the ICD-10 code for sarcopenia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016;7:512-514. PubMed 27891296 ↗
  6. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Sayer AA. Sarcopenia. Lancet. 2019;393:2636-2646. PubMed 31171417 ↗
  7. Studenski SA, et al. The FNIH sarcopenia project: rationale, study description, conference recommendations, and final estimates. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69:547-558. PubMed 24737557 ↗
  8. Chen LK, et al. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21:300-307. PubMed 32033882 ↗
  9. Bhasin S, et al. Sarcopenia Definition: The Position Statements of the Sarcopenia Definition and Outcomes Consortium. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68:1410-1418. PubMed 32150289 ↗
  10. Peterson MD, et al. Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2010;9:226-237. PubMed 20385254 ↗
  11. Cermak NM, et al. Protein supplementation augments the adaptive response of skeletal muscle to resistance-type exercise training: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;96:1454-1464. PubMed 23134885 ↗
  12. Bauer J, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people: a position paper from the PROT-AGE Study Group. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14:542-559. PubMed 23867520 ↗
  13. Villareal DT, et al. Weight loss, exercise, or both and physical function in obese older adults. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1218-1229. PubMed 21449785 ↗
  14. Papadakis MA, et al. Growth hormone replacement in healthy older men improves body composition but not functional ability. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:708-716. PubMed 8633830 ↗
  15. Liu H, et al. Systematic review: the safety and efficacy of growth hormone in the healthy elderly. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:104-115. PubMed 17227934 ↗
  16. Sattler FR, et al. Testosterone and growth hormone improve body composition and muscle performance in older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:1991-2001. PubMed 19293261 ↗
  17. Nass R, et al. Effects of an oral ghrelin mimetic on body composition and clinical outcomes in healthy older adults: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:601-611. PubMed 18981485 ↗
  18. Falutz J, et al. Metabolic effects of a growth hormone-releasing factor in patients with HIV. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2359-2370. PubMed 18057338 ↗
  19. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, DailyMed. EGRIFTA SV (tesamorelin for injection): prescribing information, indications and usage. dailymed.nlm.nih.gov ↗
  20. Kojima M, et al. Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature. 1999;402:656-660. PubMed 10604470 ↗
  21. Temel JS, et al. Anamorelin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and cachexia (ROMANA 1 and ROMANA 2): results from two randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:519-531. PubMed 26906526 ↗
  22. Roeland EJ, et al. Management of Cancer Cachexia: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:2438-2453. PubMed 32432946 ↗
  23. Ono Pharmaceutical. ONO Receives a Manufacturing and Marketing Approval of Adlumiz, a Ghrelin Receptor Agonist for the Treatment of Cancer Cachexia in Japan. January 22, 2021. ono-pharma.com ↗
  24. European Medicines Agency. Adlumiz (anamorelin): refusal of the marketing authorisation, EPAR. 2017. ema.europa.eu ↗
  25. Neeland IJ, Linge J, Birkenfeld AL. Changes in lean body mass with glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapies and mitigation strategies. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024;26 Suppl 4:16-27. PubMed 38937282 ↗
  26. Rooks D, et al. Bimagrumab vs Optimized Standard of Care for Treatment of Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e2020836. PubMed 33074327 ↗
  27. Beck DE, et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept study of the Ghrelin mimetic ipamorelin for the management of postoperative ileus in bowel resection patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:1527-1534. PubMed 25331030 ↗
  28. Fearon K, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:489-495. PubMed 21296615 ↗

Informational article. It summarizes news, official statements and published studies; it is not medical or legal advice. Sources were checked on the publication date.

Keep reading

← All articles